In words, everyone calls themselves “guarantors”. In reality, especially today, it is something else.
At the first notice of investigation, the resignation of the political opponent is loudly requested, while silence is preferred if it is a party colleague.
Therefore, a judgment of condemnation is anticipated that may never arrive but which produces irreparable effects on the lives of those who fall into the clutches of justice and their families.
For me, the most superficial justice is also practiced by those who, not journalists, but simple users of social media, slam the monster on the front page. Sometimes the post is enriched with aggressive comments, other times silence is preferred, however the substance does not change.
Only when one finds oneself to be the protagonist of these unfortunate events does one understand the value and necessity of guarantees and, therefore, of guarantorism.
But couldn't we think about it first?
www.ilfoglio.it 
