Criminal jurisprudence We go back to the origins.
Of course, it could be easier in case of urgency. It happens, sometimes, that a Colleague, following a delay or unexpected commitment, asks, even by telephone, to be replaced in the hearing. However, I agree with the reasoning followed by the Supreme Court.
The appointment pursuant to art. 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must be made in writing.
It remains to be seen whether, in case of urgency, it is sufficient to show the Judge the PEC or simply the email, containing the proxy to substitute, arrived on our smartphone but not printed due to lack of time, with the possibility of subsequent filing.
#No to #Nappointment #a #substitute #orale
